Czechoslovakia vs Germany: Manure applied — Cropland nitrogen per unit area
Manure applied — Cropland nitrogen per unit area over time
- Czechoslovakia
- Germany
How they compare
Czechoslovakia currently reports 45.66 kg/ha against 43.6 kg/ha in Germany, a difference of 2.06 kg/ha.
Across all 32 years both countries report, Germany has been ahead every year.
Czechoslovakia ranks 44th and Germany ranks 46th of 200 countries.
Germany has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Czechoslovakia | Germany | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 40.46 kg/ha | 62.6 kg/ha | 22.14 kg/ha | Germany |
| 1970s | 43.94 kg/ha | 68.05 kg/ha | 24.11 kg/ha | Germany |
| 1980s | 50.32 kg/ha | 72.16 kg/ha | 21.84 kg/ha | Germany |
| 1990s | 49.15 kg/ha | 64.94 kg/ha | 15.79 kg/ha | Germany |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher manure applied — cropland nitrogen per unit area, Czechoslovakia or Germany?
- Czechoslovakia, at 45.66 kg/ha against 43.6 kg/ha in Germany as of 1992.
- What is the difference in manure applied — cropland nitrogen per unit area between Czechoslovakia and Germany?
- 2.06 kg/ha, with Czechoslovakia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Czechoslovakia and Germany?
- 32 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 1992.
- How do Czechoslovakia and Germany rank globally for manure applied — cropland nitrogen per unit area?
- Czechoslovakia ranks 44th and Germany ranks 46th of 200 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Manure applied — Cropland nitrogen per unit area. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).