Eritrea vs Russian Federation: Manure applied — Cropland nitrogen per unit area
Manure applied — Cropland nitrogen per unit area over time
- Eritrea
- Russian Federation
How they compare
Russian Federation currently reports 9.35 kg/ha against 8.93 kg/ha in Eritrea, a difference of 0.42 kg/ha.
Across all 31 years both countries report, Russian Federation has been ahead every year.
Eritrea ranks 132nd and Russian Federation ranks 129th of 185 countries.
Russian Federation has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Eritrea | Russian Federation | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 7.25 kg/ha | 14.64 kg/ha | 7.39 kg/ha | Russian Federation |
| 2000s | 8.07 kg/ha | 9.75 kg/ha | 1.68 kg/ha | Russian Federation |
| 2010s | 8.57 kg/ha | 9.3 kg/ha | 0.735 kg/ha | Russian Federation |
| 2020s | 8.93 kg/ha | 9.31 kg/ha | 0.3872 kg/ha | Russian Federation |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher manure applied — cropland nitrogen per unit area, Eritrea or Russian Federation?
- Russian Federation, at 9.35 kg/ha against 8.93 kg/ha in Eritrea as of 2023.
- What is the difference in manure applied — cropland nitrogen per unit area between Eritrea and Russian Federation?
- 0.42 kg/ha, with Russian Federation ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Eritrea and Russian Federation?
- 31 years are reported by both, from 1993 to 2023.
- How do Eritrea and Russian Federation rank globally for manure applied — cropland nitrogen per unit area?
- Eritrea ranks 132nd and Russian Federation ranks 129th of 185 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Manure applied — Cropland nitrogen per unit area. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).