Estonia vs Sao Tome and Principe: Manure applied — Cropland nitrogen per unit area
Manure applied — Cropland nitrogen per unit area over time
- Estonia
- Sao Tome and Principe
How they compare
Sao Tome and Principe currently reports 15.52 kg/ha against 14.97 kg/ha in Estonia, a difference of 0.55 kg/ha.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 32 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Estonia ahead.
Estonia ranks 106th and Sao Tome and Principe ranks 105th of 185 countries.
Estonia has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Estonia | Sao Tome and Principe | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 21.14 kg/ha | 2.08 kg/ha | 19.06 kg/ha | Estonia |
| 2000s | 19.83 kg/ha | 6.17 kg/ha | 13.67 kg/ha | Estonia |
| 2010s | 17.4 kg/ha | 13.88 kg/ha | 3.52 kg/ha | Estonia |
| 2020s | 15.54 kg/ha | 14.79 kg/ha | 0.7524 kg/ha | Estonia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher manure applied — cropland nitrogen per unit area, Estonia or Sao Tome and Principe?
- Sao Tome and Principe, at 15.52 kg/ha against 14.97 kg/ha in Estonia as of 2023.
- What is the difference in manure applied — cropland nitrogen per unit area between Estonia and Sao Tome and Principe?
- 0.55 kg/ha, with Sao Tome and Principe ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Estonia and Sao Tome and Principe?
- 32 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2023.
- How do Estonia and Sao Tome and Principe rank globally for manure applied — cropland nitrogen per unit area?
- Estonia ranks 106th and Sao Tome and Principe ranks 105th of 185 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Manure applied — Cropland nitrogen per unit area. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).