Ethiopia vs Saudi Arabia: Manure applied — Cropland nitrogen per unit area
Manure applied — Cropland nitrogen per unit area over time
- Ethiopia
- Saudi Arabia
How they compare
Saudi Arabia currently reports 7.04 kg/ha against 6.81 kg/ha in Ethiopia, a difference of 0.23 kg/ha.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 31 shared years of data; in 1993 it was Ethiopia ahead.
Ethiopia ranks 160th and Saudi Arabia ranks 157th of 200 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Ethiopia averaged higher in 3 and Saudi Arabia in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Ethiopia | Saudi Arabia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 4.79 kg/ha | 3.07 kg/ha | 1.73 kg/ha | Ethiopia |
| 2000s | 5.11 kg/ha | 4.2 kg/ha | 0.9152 kg/ha | Ethiopia |
| 2010s | 6.56 kg/ha | 5.85 kg/ha | 0.7134 kg/ha | Ethiopia |
| 2020s | 6.44 kg/ha | 6.94 kg/ha | 0.501 kg/ha | Saudi Arabia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher manure applied — cropland nitrogen per unit area, Ethiopia or Saudi Arabia?
- Saudi Arabia, at 7.04 kg/ha against 6.81 kg/ha in Ethiopia as of 2023.
- What is the difference in manure applied — cropland nitrogen per unit area between Ethiopia and Saudi Arabia?
- 0.23 kg/ha, with Saudi Arabia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Ethiopia and Saudi Arabia?
- 31 years are reported by both, from 1993 to 2023.
- How do Ethiopia and Saudi Arabia rank globally for manure applied — cropland nitrogen per unit area?
- Ethiopia ranks 160th and Saudi Arabia ranks 157th of 200 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Manure applied — Cropland nitrogen per unit area. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).