Ethiopia vs Sudan (former): Manure applied — Cropland nitrogen per unit area
Manure applied — Cropland nitrogen per unit area over time
- Ethiopia
- Sudan (former)
How they compare
Ethiopia currently reports 6.81 kg/ha against 6.12 kg/ha in Sudan (former), a difference of 0.69 kg/ha.
That makes Ethiopia's figure about 1.1 times Sudan (former)'s.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 19 shared years of data; in 1993 it was Ethiopia ahead.
Ethiopia ranks 160th and Sudan (former) ranks 162nd of 200 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Ethiopia averaged higher in 2 and Sudan (former) in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Ethiopia | Sudan (former) | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 4.79 kg/ha | 4.54 kg/ha | 0.2531 kg/ha | Ethiopia |
| 2000s | 5.11 kg/ha | 6.31 kg/ha | 1.2 kg/ha | Sudan (former) |
| 2010s | 6.49 kg/ha | 6.21 kg/ha | 0.2801 kg/ha | Ethiopia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher manure applied — cropland nitrogen per unit area, Ethiopia or Sudan (former)?
- Ethiopia, at 6.81 kg/ha against 6.12 kg/ha in Sudan (former) as of 2023.
- What is the difference in manure applied — cropland nitrogen per unit area between Ethiopia and Sudan (former)?
- 0.69 kg/ha, with Ethiopia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Ethiopia and Sudan (former)?
- 19 years are reported by both, from 1993 to 2011.
- How do Ethiopia and Sudan (former) rank globally for manure applied — cropland nitrogen per unit area?
- Ethiopia ranks 160th and Sudan (former) ranks 162nd of 200 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Manure applied — Cropland nitrogen per unit area. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).