Iceland vs Malawi: Manure applied — Cropland nitrogen per unit area
Manure applied — Cropland nitrogen per unit area over time
- Iceland
- Malawi
How they compare
Iceland currently reports 33.22 kg/ha against 32.23 kg/ha in Malawi, a difference of 0.99 kg/ha.
Across all 63 years both countries report, Iceland has been ahead every year.
Iceland ranks 60th and Malawi ranks 63rd of 185 countries.
Iceland has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Iceland | Malawi | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 35.5 kg/ha | 1.7 kg/ha | 33.8 kg/ha | Iceland |
| 1970s | 35.64 kg/ha | 1.93 kg/ha | 33.7 kg/ha | Iceland |
| 1980s | 33.84 kg/ha | 2.4 kg/ha | 31.44 kg/ha | Iceland |
| 1990s | 32.42 kg/ha | 2.7 kg/ha | 29.72 kg/ha | Iceland |
| 2000s | 31.23 kg/ha | 3.85 kg/ha | 27.39 kg/ha | Iceland |
| 2010s | 34.02 kg/ha | 14.72 kg/ha | 19.3 kg/ha | Iceland |
| 2020s | 33.29 kg/ha | 29.19 kg/ha | 4.11 kg/ha | Iceland |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher manure applied — cropland nitrogen per unit area, Iceland or Malawi?
- Iceland, at 33.22 kg/ha against 32.23 kg/ha in Malawi as of 2023.
- What is the difference in manure applied — cropland nitrogen per unit area between Iceland and Malawi?
- 0.99 kg/ha, with Iceland ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Iceland and Malawi?
- 63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
- How do Iceland and Malawi rank globally for manure applied — cropland nitrogen per unit area?
- Iceland ranks 60th and Malawi ranks 63rd of 185 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Manure applied — Cropland nitrogen per unit area. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).