Middle Africa vs Uzbekistan: Manure applied — Cropland nitrogen per unit area
Manure applied — Cropland nitrogen per unit area over time
- Middle Africa
- Uzbekistan
How they compare
Uzbekistan currently reports 74.19 kg/ha against 5.57 kg/ha in Middle Africa, a difference of 68.62 kg/ha.
That makes Uzbekistan's figure about 13.3 times Middle Africa's.
Across all 32 years both countries report, Uzbekistan has been ahead every year.
Middle Africa ranks 15th and Uzbekistan ranks 23rd of 18 regions.
Uzbekistan has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Middle Africa | Uzbekistan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 3.61 kg/ha | 25.94 kg/ha | 22.33 kg/ha | Uzbekistan |
| 2000s | 4.59 kg/ha | 31.15 kg/ha | 26.56 kg/ha | Uzbekistan |
| 2010s | 4.98 kg/ha | 56.19 kg/ha | 51.21 kg/ha | Uzbekistan |
| 2020s | 5.38 kg/ha | 71.64 kg/ha | 66.26 kg/ha | Uzbekistan |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher manure applied — cropland nitrogen per unit area, Middle Africa or Uzbekistan?
- Uzbekistan, at 74.19 kg/ha against 5.57 kg/ha in Middle Africa as of 2023.
- What is the difference in manure applied — cropland nitrogen per unit area between Middle Africa and Uzbekistan?
- 68.62 kg/ha, with Uzbekistan ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Middle Africa and Uzbekistan?
- 32 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2023.
- How do Middle Africa and Uzbekistan rank globally for manure applied — cropland nitrogen per unit area?
- Middle Africa ranks 15th and Uzbekistan ranks 23rd of 18 regions.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Manure applied — Cropland nitrogen per unit area. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).