Myanmar vs Slovakia: Manure applied — Cropland nitrogen per unit area
Manure applied — Cropland nitrogen per unit area over time
- Myanmar
- Slovakia
How they compare
Myanmar currently reports 19 kg/ha against 17.34 kg/ha in Slovakia, a difference of 1.66 kg/ha.
That makes Myanmar's figure about 1.1 times Slovakia's.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 31 shared years of data; in 1993 it was Slovakia ahead.
Myanmar ranks 104th and Slovakia ranks 107th of 200 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Myanmar averaged higher in 2 and Slovakia in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Myanmar | Slovakia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 18.75 kg/ha | 34.83 kg/ha | 16.08 kg/ha | Slovakia |
| 2000s | 22.38 kg/ha | 26.14 kg/ha | 3.76 kg/ha | Slovakia |
| 2010s | 28.67 kg/ha | 20.32 kg/ha | 8.34 kg/ha | Myanmar |
| 2020s | 18.48 kg/ha | 17.84 kg/ha | 0.6373 kg/ha | Myanmar |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher manure applied — cropland nitrogen per unit area, Myanmar or Slovakia?
- Myanmar, at 19 kg/ha against 17.34 kg/ha in Slovakia as of 2023.
- What is the difference in manure applied — cropland nitrogen per unit area between Myanmar and Slovakia?
- 1.66 kg/ha, with Myanmar ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Myanmar and Slovakia?
- 31 years are reported by both, from 1993 to 2023.
- How do Myanmar and Slovakia rank globally for manure applied — cropland nitrogen per unit area?
- Myanmar ranks 104th and Slovakia ranks 107th of 200 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Manure applied — Cropland nitrogen per unit area. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).