New Caledonia vs Uzbekistan: Manure applied — Cropland nitrogen per unit area
Manure applied — Cropland nitrogen per unit area over time
- New Caledonia
- Uzbekistan
How they compare
New Caledonia currently reports 74.21 kg/ha against 74.19 kg/ha in Uzbekistan, a difference of 0.02 kg/ha.
Across all 32 years both countries report, New Caledonia has been ahead every year.
New Caledonia ranks 21st and Uzbekistan ranks 22nd of 184 countries.
New Caledonia has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | New Caledonia | Uzbekistan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 52.21 kg/ha | 25.94 kg/ha | 26.27 kg/ha | New Caledonia |
| 2000s | 68.54 kg/ha | 31.15 kg/ha | 37.39 kg/ha | New Caledonia |
| 2010s | 73.06 kg/ha | 56.19 kg/ha | 16.88 kg/ha | New Caledonia |
| 2020s | 74.94 kg/ha | 71.64 kg/ha | 3.31 kg/ha | New Caledonia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher manure applied — cropland nitrogen per unit area, New Caledonia or Uzbekistan?
- New Caledonia, at 74.21 kg/ha against 74.19 kg/ha in Uzbekistan as of 2023.
- What is the difference in manure applied — cropland nitrogen per unit area between New Caledonia and Uzbekistan?
- 0.02 kg/ha, with New Caledonia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for New Caledonia and Uzbekistan?
- 32 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2023.
- How do New Caledonia and Uzbekistan rank globally for manure applied — cropland nitrogen per unit area?
- New Caledonia ranks 21st and Uzbekistan ranks 22nd of 184 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Manure applied — Cropland nitrogen per unit area. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).