South Sudan vs Tonga: Manure applied — Cropland nitrogen per unit area
Manure applied — Cropland nitrogen per unit area over time
- South Sudan
- Tonga
How they compare
South Sudan currently reports 23.1 kg/ha against 22.3 kg/ha in Tonga, a difference of 0.8 kg/ha.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 12 shared years of data; in 2012 it was Tonga ahead.
South Sudan ranks 88th and Tonga ranks 90th of 200 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, South Sudan averaged higher in 1 and Tonga in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | South Sudan | Tonga | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 20.24 kg/ha | 22.46 kg/ha | 2.22 kg/ha | Tonga |
| 2020s | 23.32 kg/ha | 22.26 kg/ha | 1.07 kg/ha | South Sudan |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher manure applied — cropland nitrogen per unit area, South Sudan or Tonga?
- South Sudan, at 23.1 kg/ha against 22.3 kg/ha in Tonga as of 2023.
- What is the difference in manure applied — cropland nitrogen per unit area between South Sudan and Tonga?
- 0.8 kg/ha, with South Sudan ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for South Sudan and Tonga?
- 12 years are reported by both, from 2012 to 2023.
- How do South Sudan and Tonga rank globally for manure applied — cropland nitrogen per unit area?
- South Sudan ranks 88th and Tonga ranks 90th of 200 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Manure applied — Cropland nitrogen per unit area. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).