Armenia vs Montenegro: Manure applied — Cropland nitrogen

Armenia
4,291 t
in 2023
Montenegro
4,260 t
in 2023
Armenia rank
150th
Montenegro rank
151st

Manure applied — Cropland nitrogen over time

  • Armenia
  • Montenegro
02.0k4.0k6.0k199220072023

How they compare

Armenia currently reports 4,291 t against 4,260 t in Montenegro, a difference of 31 t.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 18 shared years of data; in 2006 it was Montenegro ahead.

Armenia ranks 150th and Montenegro ranks 151st of 200 countries.

Across the 3 decades both report, Armenia averaged higher in 1 and Montenegro in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade Armenia Montenegro Difference Ahead
2000s 3,702 t 5,829 t 2,127 t Montenegro
2010s 4,146 t 4,987 t 841.28 t Montenegro
2020s 4,624 t 4,294 t 329.76 t Armenia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher manure applied — cropland nitrogen, Armenia or Montenegro?
Armenia, at 4,291 t against 4,260 t in Montenegro as of 2023.
What is the difference in manure applied — cropland nitrogen between Armenia and Montenegro?
31 t, with Armenia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Armenia and Montenegro?
18 years are reported by both, from 2006 to 2023.
How do Armenia and Montenegro rank globally for manure applied — cropland nitrogen?
Armenia ranks 150th and Montenegro ranks 151st of 200 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Manure applied — Cropland nitrogen. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Manure applied — Cropland nitrogen
Unit
t
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
232 places, 13,437 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).