Armenia vs Syrian Arab Republic: Manure applied β Cropland nitrogen
Manure applied β Cropland nitrogen over time
- Armenia
- Syrian Arab Republic
How they compare
Syrian Arab Republic currently reports 4,362 t against 4,291 t in Armenia, a difference of 71 t.
The two have swapped places 5 times across 32 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Armenia ahead.
Armenia ranks 150th and Syrian Arab Republic ranks 148th of 200 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Armenia averaged higher in 1 and Syrian Arab Republic in 3.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Armenia | Syrian Arab Republic | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 3,070 t | 4,792 t | 1,722 t | Syrian Arab Republic |
| 2000s | 3,360 t | 6,231 t | 2,871 t | Syrian Arab Republic |
| 2010s | 4,146 t | 5,364 t | 1,218 t | Syrian Arab Republic |
| 2020s | 4,624 t | 4,547 t | 77.07 t | Armenia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher manure applied β cropland nitrogen, Armenia or Syrian Arab Republic?
- Syrian Arab Republic, at 4,362 t against 4,291 t in Armenia as of 2023.
- What is the difference in manure applied β cropland nitrogen between Armenia and Syrian Arab Republic?
- 71 t, with Syrian Arab Republic ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Armenia and Syrian Arab Republic?
- 32 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2023.
- How do Armenia and Syrian Arab Republic rank globally for manure applied β cropland nitrogen?
- Armenia ranks 150th and Syrian Arab Republic ranks 148th of 200 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Manure applied β Cropland nitrogen. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).