Bangladesh vs Czechoslovakia: Manure applied — Cropland nitrogen
Manure applied — Cropland nitrogen over time
- Bangladesh
- Czechoslovakia
How they compare
Bangladesh currently reports 273,534 t against 229,509 t in Czechoslovakia, a difference of 44,025 t.
That makes Bangladesh's figure about 1.2 times Czechoslovakia's.
Across all 32 years both countries report, Czechoslovakia has been ahead every year.
Bangladesh ranks 21st and Czechoslovakia ranks 23rd of 200 countries.
Czechoslovakia has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Bangladesh | Czechoslovakia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 112,646 t | 217,885 t | 105,239 t | Czechoslovakia |
| 1970s | 136,056 t | 231,970 t | 95,914 t | Czechoslovakia |
| 1980s | 130,680 t | 259,187 t | 128,507 t | Czechoslovakia |
| 1990s | 152,185 t | 248,647 t | 96,462 t | Czechoslovakia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher manure applied — cropland nitrogen, Bangladesh or Czechoslovakia?
- Bangladesh, at 273,534 t against 229,509 t in Czechoslovakia as of 2023.
- What is the difference in manure applied — cropland nitrogen between Bangladesh and Czechoslovakia?
- 44,025 t, with Bangladesh ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Bangladesh and Czechoslovakia?
- 32 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 1992.
- How do Bangladesh and Czechoslovakia rank globally for manure applied — cropland nitrogen?
- Bangladesh ranks 21st and Czechoslovakia ranks 23rd of 200 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Manure applied — Cropland nitrogen. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).