Barbados vs Eswatini: Manure applied — Cropland nitrogen
Manure applied — Cropland nitrogen over time
- Barbados
- Eswatini
How they compare
Eswatini currently reports 1,834 t against 1,679 t in Barbados, a difference of 155 t.
That makes Eswatini's figure about 1.1 times Barbados's.
Across all 63 years both countries report, Eswatini has been ahead every year.
Barbados ranks 165th and Eswatini ranks 164th of 200 countries.
Eswatini has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Barbados | Eswatini | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 586.21 t | 1,127 t | 540.87 t | Eswatini |
| 1970s | 891.29 t | 1,344 t | 452.86 t | Eswatini |
| 1980s | 1,275 t | 1,504 t | 228.46 t | Eswatini |
| 1990s | 1,276 t | 1,663 t | 387.39 t | Eswatini |
| 2000s | 1,217 t | 1,699 t | 481.74 t | Eswatini |
| 2010s | 1,461 t | 1,803 t | 342.46 t | Eswatini |
| 2020s | 1,657 t | 1,883 t | 225.56 t | Eswatini |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher manure applied — cropland nitrogen, Barbados or Eswatini?
- Eswatini, at 1,834 t against 1,679 t in Barbados as of 2023.
- What is the difference in manure applied — cropland nitrogen between Barbados and Eswatini?
- 155 t, with Eswatini ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Barbados and Eswatini?
- 63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
- How do Barbados and Eswatini rank globally for manure applied — cropland nitrogen?
- Barbados ranks 165th and Eswatini ranks 164th of 200 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Manure applied — Cropland nitrogen. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).