Belarus vs Nigeria: Manure applied — Cropland nitrogen
Manure applied — Cropland nitrogen over time
- Belarus
- Nigeria
How they compare
Nigeria currently reports 217,114 t against 213,157 t in Belarus, a difference of 3,957 t.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 32 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Belarus ahead.
Belarus ranks 26th and Nigeria ranks 24th of 200 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Belarus averaged higher in 3 and Nigeria in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Belarus | Nigeria | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 237,430 t | 102,397 t | 135,033 t | Belarus |
| 2000s | 184,344 t | 141,282 t | 43,062 t | Belarus |
| 2010s | 211,093 t | 174,982 t | 36,111 t | Belarus |
| 2020s | 211,422 t | 213,914 t | 2,492 t | Nigeria |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher manure applied — cropland nitrogen, Belarus or Nigeria?
- Nigeria, at 217,114 t against 213,157 t in Belarus as of 2023.
- What is the difference in manure applied — cropland nitrogen between Belarus and Nigeria?
- 3,957 t, with Nigeria ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Belarus and Nigeria?
- 32 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2023.
- How do Belarus and Nigeria rank globally for manure applied — cropland nitrogen?
- Belarus ranks 26th and Nigeria ranks 24th of 200 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Manure applied — Cropland nitrogen. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).