Belarus vs Western Africa: Manure applied β Cropland nitrogen
Manure applied β Cropland nitrogen over time
- Belarus
- Western Africa
How they compare
Western Africa currently reports 505,940 t against 213,157 t in Belarus, a difference of 292,783 t.
That makes Western Africa's figure about 2.4 times Belarus's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 32 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Belarus ahead.
Belarus ranks 26th and Western Africa ranks 24th of 200 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Belarus averaged higher in 1 and Western Africa in 3.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Belarus | Western Africa | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 237,430 t | 223,017 t | 14,413 t | Belarus |
| 2000s | 184,344 t | 307,297 t | 122,952 t | Western Africa |
| 2010s | 211,093 t | 411,297 t | 200,204 t | Western Africa |
| 2020s | 211,422 t | 491,785 t | 280,364 t | Western Africa |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher manure applied β cropland nitrogen, Belarus or Western Africa?
- Western Africa, at 505,940 t against 213,157 t in Belarus as of 2023.
- What is the difference in manure applied β cropland nitrogen between Belarus and Western Africa?
- 292,783 t, with Western Africa ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Belarus and Western Africa?
- 32 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2023.
- How do Belarus and Western Africa rank globally for manure applied β cropland nitrogen?
- Belarus ranks 26th and Western Africa ranks 24th of 200 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Manure applied β Cropland nitrogen. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).