Belize vs Mauritius: Manure applied — Cropland nitrogen
Manure applied — Cropland nitrogen over time
- Belize
- Mauritius
How they compare
Mauritius currently reports 1,527 t against 1,055 t in Belize, a difference of 472 t.
That makes Mauritius's figure about 1.4 times Belize's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Belize ahead.
Belize ranks 157th and Mauritius ranks 154th of 185 countries.
Across the 7 decades both report, Belize averaged higher in 4 and Mauritius in 3.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Belize | Mauritius | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 378.69 t | 189.28 t | 189.41 t | Belize |
| 1970s | 477.55 t | 234.76 t | 242.79 t | Belize |
| 1980s | 644.96 t | 396.63 t | 248.33 t | Belize |
| 1990s | 745.31 t | 716.33 t | 28.98 t | Belize |
| 2000s | 797.54 t | 1,015 t | 217.59 t | Mauritius |
| 2010s | 971.03 t | 1,383 t | 412.24 t | Mauritius |
| 2020s | 1,040 t | 1,513 t | 473.84 t | Mauritius |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher manure applied — cropland nitrogen, Belize or Mauritius?
- Mauritius, at 1,527 t against 1,055 t in Belize as of 2023.
- What is the difference in manure applied — cropland nitrogen between Belize and Mauritius?
- 472 t, with Mauritius ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Belize and Mauritius?
- 63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
- How do Belize and Mauritius rank globally for manure applied — cropland nitrogen?
- Belize ranks 157th and Mauritius ranks 154th of 185 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Manure applied — Cropland nitrogen. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).