Bosnia and Herzegovina vs Slovakia: Manure applied — Cropland nitrogen
Manure applied — Cropland nitrogen over time
- Bosnia and Herzegovina
- Slovakia
How they compare
Slovakia currently reports 22,962 t against 22,068 t in Bosnia and Herzegovina, a difference of 894 t.
The two have swapped places 6 times across 31 shared years of data; in 1993 it was Slovakia ahead.
Bosnia and Herzegovina ranks 101st and Slovakia ranks 99th of 185 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Bosnia and Herzegovina averaged higher in 2 and Slovakia in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Bosnia and Herzegovina | Slovakia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 26,133 t | 55,813 t | 29,680 t | Slovakia |
| 2000s | 31,700 t | 37,648 t | 5,949 t | Slovakia |
| 2010s | 32,805 t | 28,107 t | 4,698 t | Bosnia and Herzegovina |
| 2020s | 24,739 t | 23,971 t | 768.6 t | Bosnia and Herzegovina |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher manure applied — cropland nitrogen, Bosnia and Herzegovina or Slovakia?
- Slovakia, at 22,962 t against 22,068 t in Bosnia and Herzegovina as of 2023.
- What is the difference in manure applied — cropland nitrogen between Bosnia and Herzegovina and Slovakia?
- 894 t, with Slovakia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Bosnia and Herzegovina and Slovakia?
- 31 years are reported by both, from 1993 to 2023.
- How do Bosnia and Herzegovina and Slovakia rank globally for manure applied — cropland nitrogen?
- Bosnia and Herzegovina ranks 101st and Slovakia ranks 99th of 185 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Manure applied — Cropland nitrogen. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).