Brazil vs Viet Nam: Manure applied — Cropland nitrogen
Manure applied — Cropland nitrogen over time
- Brazil
- Viet Nam
How they compare
Brazil currently reports 1.44 million t against 330,987 t in Viet Nam, a difference of 1.11 million t.
That makes Brazil's figure about 4.3 times Viet Nam's.
Across all 63 years both countries report, Brazil has been ahead every year.
Brazil ranks 5th and Viet Nam ranks 4th of 185 countries.
Brazil has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Brazil | Viet Nam | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 669,236 t | 96,540 t | 572,696 t | Brazil |
| 1970s | 889,307 t | 98,293 t | 791,014 t | Brazil |
| 1980s | 1.10 million t | 125,962 t | 971,645 t | Brazil |
| 1990s | 1.21 million t | 173,973 t | 1.03 million t | Brazil |
| 2000s | 1.35 million t | 251,605 t | 1.10 million t | Brazil |
| 2010s | 1.50 million t | 283,282 t | 1.22 million t | Brazil |
| 2020s | 1.43 million t | 321,551 t | 1.11 million t | Brazil |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher manure applied — cropland nitrogen, Brazil or Viet Nam?
- Brazil, at 1.44 million t against 330,987 t in Viet Nam as of 2023.
- What is the difference in manure applied — cropland nitrogen between Brazil and Viet Nam?
- 1.11 million t, with Brazil ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Brazil and Viet Nam?
- 63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
- How do Brazil and Viet Nam rank globally for manure applied — cropland nitrogen?
- Brazil ranks 5th and Viet Nam ranks 4th of 185 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Manure applied — Cropland nitrogen. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).