Burkina Faso vs Cuba: Manure applied — Cropland nitrogen
Manure applied — Cropland nitrogen over time
- Burkina Faso
- Cuba
How they compare
Burkina Faso currently reports 44,540 t against 44,023 t in Cuba, a difference of 517 t.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Cuba ahead.
Burkina Faso ranks 82nd and Cuba ranks 83rd of 200 countries.
Across the 7 decades both report, Burkina Faso averaged higher in 2 and Cuba in 5.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Burkina Faso | Cuba | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 6,384 t | 46,229 t | 39,846 t | Cuba |
| 1970s | 7,775 t | 47,707 t | 39,932 t | Cuba |
| 1980s | 13,542 t | 52,815 t | 39,274 t | Cuba |
| 1990s | 23,213 t | 51,958 t | 28,745 t | Cuba |
| 2000s | 42,764 t | 46,654 t | 3,889 t | Cuba |
| 2010s | 55,967 t | 48,152 t | 7,815 t | Burkina Faso |
| 2020s | 44,531 t | 38,683 t | 5,848 t | Burkina Faso |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher manure applied — cropland nitrogen, Burkina Faso or Cuba?
- Burkina Faso, at 44,540 t against 44,023 t in Cuba as of 2023.
- What is the difference in manure applied — cropland nitrogen between Burkina Faso and Cuba?
- 517 t, with Burkina Faso ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Burkina Faso and Cuba?
- 63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
- How do Burkina Faso and Cuba rank globally for manure applied — cropland nitrogen?
- Burkina Faso ranks 82nd and Cuba ranks 83rd of 200 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Manure applied — Cropland nitrogen. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).