Burundi vs Iraq: Manure applied — Cropland nitrogen

Burundi
24,525 t
in 2023
Iraq
24,809 t
in 2023
Burundi rank
105th
Iraq rank
103rd

Manure applied — Cropland nitrogen over time

  • Burundi
  • Iraq
010.0k20.0k30.0k196119922023

How they compare

Iraq currently reports 24,809 t against 24,525 t in Burundi, a difference of 284 t.

Across all 63 years both countries report, Iraq has been ahead every year.

Burundi ranks 105th and Iraq ranks 103rd of 200 countries.

Iraq has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Burundi Iraq Difference Ahead
1960s 1,152 t 8,858 t 7,706 t Iraq
1970s 1,957 t 9,694 t 7,737 t Iraq
1980s 2,352 t 13,421 t 11,069 t Iraq
1990s 2,593 t 6,991 t 4,398 t Iraq
2000s 3,334 t 10,779 t 7,445 t Iraq
2010s 9,643 t 14,453 t 4,810 t Iraq
2020s 20,970 t 23,171 t 2,201 t Iraq

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher manure applied — cropland nitrogen, Burundi or Iraq?
Iraq, at 24,809 t against 24,525 t in Burundi as of 2023.
What is the difference in manure applied — cropland nitrogen between Burundi and Iraq?
284 t, with Iraq ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Burundi and Iraq?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Burundi and Iraq rank globally for manure applied — cropland nitrogen?
Burundi ranks 105th and Iraq ranks 103rd of 200 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Manure applied — Cropland nitrogen. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Manure applied — Cropland nitrogen
Unit
t
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
232 places, 13,437 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).