Cabo Verde vs Mongolia: Manure applied — Cropland nitrogen
Manure applied — Cropland nitrogen over time
- Cabo Verde
- Mongolia
How they compare
Mongolia currently reports 173,948 t against 1,193 t in Cabo Verde, a difference of 172,755 t.
That makes Mongolia's figure about 145.8 times Cabo Verde's.
Across all 63 years both countries report, Mongolia has been ahead every year.
Cabo Verde ranks 29th and Mongolia ranks 28th of 29 countries.
Mongolia has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Cabo Verde | Mongolia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 272.06 t | 66,755 t | 66,483 t | Mongolia |
| 1970s | 401.35 t | 73,924 t | 73,522 t | Mongolia |
| 1980s | 971.31 t | 77,017 t | 76,046 t | Mongolia |
| 1990s | 2,437 t | 91,913 t | 89,476 t | Mongolia |
| 2000s | 2,017 t | 86,954 t | 84,937 t | Mongolia |
| 2010s | 1,329 t | 128,301 t | 126,971 t | Mongolia |
| 2020s | 1,176 t | 175,456 t | 174,280 t | Mongolia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher manure applied — cropland nitrogen, Cabo Verde or Mongolia?
- Mongolia, at 173,948 t against 1,193 t in Cabo Verde as of 2023.
- What is the difference in manure applied — cropland nitrogen between Cabo Verde and Mongolia?
- 172,755 t, with Mongolia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Cabo Verde and Mongolia?
- 63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
- How do Cabo Verde and Mongolia rank globally for manure applied — cropland nitrogen?
- Cabo Verde ranks 29th and Mongolia ranks 28th of 29 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Manure applied — Cropland nitrogen. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).