Cambodia vs Ethiopia PDR: Manure applied — Cropland nitrogen
Manure applied — Cropland nitrogen over time
- Cambodia
- Ethiopia PDR
How they compare
Ethiopia PDR currently reports 58,423 t against 54,818 t in Cambodia, a difference of 3,605 t.
That makes Ethiopia PDR's figure about 1.1 times Cambodia's.
Across all 32 years both countries report, Ethiopia PDR has been ahead every year.
Cambodia ranks 74th and Ethiopia PDR ranks 71st of 200 countries.
Ethiopia PDR has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Cambodia | Ethiopia PDR | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 34,946 t | 46,672 t | 11,727 t | Ethiopia PDR |
| 1970s | 31,912 t | 49,471 t | 17,560 t | Ethiopia PDR |
| 1980s | 31,693 t | 52,656 t | 20,962 t | Ethiopia PDR |
| 1990s | 47,674 t | 57,439 t | 9,765 t | Ethiopia PDR |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher manure applied — cropland nitrogen, Cambodia or Ethiopia PDR?
- Ethiopia PDR, at 58,423 t against 54,818 t in Cambodia as of 1992.
- What is the difference in manure applied — cropland nitrogen between Cambodia and Ethiopia PDR?
- 3,605 t, with Ethiopia PDR ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Cambodia and Ethiopia PDR?
- 32 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 1992.
- How do Cambodia and Ethiopia PDR rank globally for manure applied — cropland nitrogen?
- Cambodia ranks 74th and Ethiopia PDR ranks 71st of 200 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Manure applied — Cropland nitrogen. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).