Canada vs Myanmar: Manure applied — Cropland nitrogen
Manure applied — Cropland nitrogen over time
- Canada
- Myanmar
How they compare
Myanmar currently reports 237,842 t against 216,810 t in Canada, a difference of 21,032 t.
That makes Myanmar's figure about 1.1 times Canada's.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Canada ahead.
Canada ranks 25th and Myanmar ranks 22nd of 200 countries.
Across the 7 decades both report, Canada averaged higher in 4 and Myanmar in 3.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Canada | Myanmar | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 227,255 t | 102,831 t | 124,424 t | Canada |
| 1970s | 214,804 t | 134,085 t | 80,720 t | Canada |
| 1980s | 204,713 t | 176,305 t | 28,408 t | Canada |
| 1990s | 206,904 t | 185,097 t | 21,806 t | Canada |
| 2000s | 226,987 t | 249,682 t | 22,694 t | Myanmar |
| 2010s | 214,480 t | 355,024 t | 140,543 t | Myanmar |
| 2020s | 218,227 t | 231,065 t | 12,838 t | Myanmar |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher manure applied — cropland nitrogen, Canada or Myanmar?
- Myanmar, at 237,842 t against 216,810 t in Canada as of 2023.
- What is the difference in manure applied — cropland nitrogen between Canada and Myanmar?
- 21,032 t, with Myanmar ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Canada and Myanmar?
- 63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
- How do Canada and Myanmar rank globally for manure applied — cropland nitrogen?
- Canada ranks 25th and Myanmar ranks 22nd of 200 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Manure applied — Cropland nitrogen. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).