Central America vs Czechoslovakia: Manure applied — Cropland nitrogen
Manure applied — Cropland nitrogen over time
- Central America
- Czechoslovakia
How they compare
Central America currently reports 735,167 t against 229,509 t in Czechoslovakia, a difference of 505,658 t.
That makes Central America's figure about 3.2 times Czechoslovakia's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 32 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Czechoslovakia ahead.
Central America ranks 22nd and Czechoslovakia ranks 23rd of 32 groups.
Central America has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Central America | Czechoslovakia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 267,818 t | 217,885 t | 49,933 t | Central America |
| 1970s | 367,267 t | 231,970 t | 135,297 t | Central America |
| 1980s | 458,091 t | 259,187 t | 198,904 t | Central America |
| 1990s | 452,619 t | 248,647 t | 203,972 t | Central America |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher manure applied — cropland nitrogen, Central America or Czechoslovakia?
- Central America, at 735,167 t against 229,509 t in Czechoslovakia as of 2023.
- What is the difference in manure applied — cropland nitrogen between Central America and Czechoslovakia?
- 505,658 t, with Central America ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Central America and Czechoslovakia?
- 32 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 1992.
- How do Central America and Czechoslovakia rank globally for manure applied — cropland nitrogen?
- Central America ranks 22nd and Czechoslovakia ranks 23rd of 32 groups.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Manure applied — Cropland nitrogen. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).