Central America vs Yugoslav SFR: Manure applied β Cropland nitrogen
Manure applied β Cropland nitrogen over time
- Central America
- Yugoslav SFR
How they compare
Central America currently reports 735,167 t against 298,451 t in Yugoslav SFR, a difference of 436,716 t.
That makes Central America's figure about 2.5 times Yugoslav SFR's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 31 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Yugoslav SFR ahead.
Central America ranks 22nd and Yugoslav SFR ranks 20th of 32 groups.
Across the 4 decades both report, Central America averaged higher in 3 and Yugoslav SFR in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Central America | Yugoslav SFR | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 267,818 t | 287,495 t | 19,677 t | Yugoslav SFR |
| 1970s | 367,267 t | 318,221 t | 49,046 t | Central America |
| 1980s | 458,091 t | 330,627 t | 127,464 t | Central America |
| 1990s | 449,661 t | 301,518 t | 148,144 t | Central America |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher manure applied β cropland nitrogen, Central America or Yugoslav SFR?
- Central America, at 735,167 t against 298,451 t in Yugoslav SFR as of 2023.
- What is the difference in manure applied β cropland nitrogen between Central America and Yugoslav SFR?
- 436,716 t, with Central America ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Central America and Yugoslav SFR?
- 31 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 1991.
- How do Central America and Yugoslav SFR rank globally for manure applied β cropland nitrogen?
- Central America ranks 22nd and Yugoslav SFR ranks 20th of 32 groups.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Manure applied β Cropland nitrogen. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).