Central Asia vs Yugoslav SFR: Manure applied β Cropland nitrogen
Manure applied β Cropland nitrogen over time
- Central Asia
- Yugoslav SFR
How they compare
Central Asia currently reports 692,768 t against 298,451 t in Yugoslav SFR, a difference of 394,317 t.
That makes Central Asia's figure about 2.3 times Yugoslav SFR's.
Across all 31 years both countries report, Central Asia has been ahead every year.
Central Asia ranks 23rd and Yugoslav SFR ranks 20th of 32 groups.
Central Asia has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Central Asia | Yugoslav SFR | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 458,637 t | 287,495 t | 171,142 t | Central Asia |
| 1970s | 539,613 t | 318,221 t | 221,392 t | Central Asia |
| 1980s | 604,114 t | 330,627 t | 273,487 t | Central Asia |
| 1990s | 595,116 t | 301,518 t | 293,598 t | Central Asia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher manure applied β cropland nitrogen, Central Asia or Yugoslav SFR?
- Central Asia, at 692,768 t against 298,451 t in Yugoslav SFR as of 2023.
- What is the difference in manure applied β cropland nitrogen between Central Asia and Yugoslav SFR?
- 394,317 t, with Central Asia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Central Asia and Yugoslav SFR?
- 31 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 1991.
- How do Central Asia and Yugoslav SFR rank globally for manure applied β cropland nitrogen?
- Central Asia ranks 23rd and Yugoslav SFR ranks 20th of 32 groups.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Manure applied β Cropland nitrogen. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).