Chad vs Hungary: Manure applied — Cropland nitrogen
Manure applied — Cropland nitrogen over time
- Chad
- Hungary
How they compare
Hungary currently reports 74,094 t against 69,024 t in Chad, a difference of 5,070 t.
That makes Hungary's figure about 1.1 times Chad's.
Across all 63 years both countries report, Hungary has been ahead every year.
Chad ranks 57th and Hungary ranks 54th of 185 countries.
Hungary has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Chad | Hungary | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 6,664 t | 153,026 t | 146,362 t | Hungary |
| 1970s | 6,514 t | 166,836 t | 160,322 t | Hungary |
| 1980s | 8,659 t | 176,308 t | 167,649 t | Hungary |
| 1990s | 13,911 t | 112,039 t | 98,128 t | Hungary |
| 2000s | 24,061 t | 91,046 t | 66,984 t | Hungary |
| 2010s | 42,692 t | 79,090 t | 36,398 t | Hungary |
| 2020s | 63,378 t | 77,454 t | 14,076 t | Hungary |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher manure applied — cropland nitrogen, Chad or Hungary?
- Hungary, at 74,094 t against 69,024 t in Chad as of 2023.
- What is the difference in manure applied — cropland nitrogen between Chad and Hungary?
- 5,070 t, with Hungary ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Chad and Hungary?
- 63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
- How do Chad and Hungary rank globally for manure applied — cropland nitrogen?
- Chad ranks 57th and Hungary ranks 54th of 185 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Manure applied — Cropland nitrogen. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).