Chile vs Nepal: Manure applied — Cropland nitrogen
Manure applied — Cropland nitrogen over time
- Chile
- Nepal
How they compare
Chile currently reports 78,221 t against 76,675 t in Nepal, a difference of 1,546 t.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Nepal ahead.
Chile ranks 58th and Nepal ranks 59th of 200 countries.
Across the 7 decades both report, Chile averaged higher in 1 and Nepal in 6.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Chile | Nepal | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 29,079 t | 35,624 t | 6,545 t | Nepal |
| 1970s | 35,526 t | 44,796 t | 9,270 t | Nepal |
| 1980s | 37,661 t | 56,478 t | 18,818 t | Nepal |
| 1990s | 63,477 t | 64,228 t | 750.55 t | Nepal |
| 2000s | 78,047 t | 76,711 t | 1,337 t | Chile |
| 2010s | 79,433 t | 97,221 t | 17,788 t | Nepal |
| 2020s | 79,270 t | 98,810 t | 19,539 t | Nepal |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher manure applied — cropland nitrogen, Chile or Nepal?
- Chile, at 78,221 t against 76,675 t in Nepal as of 2023.
- What is the difference in manure applied — cropland nitrogen between Chile and Nepal?
- 1,546 t, with Chile ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Chile and Nepal?
- 63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
- How do Chile and Nepal rank globally for manure applied — cropland nitrogen?
- Chile ranks 58th and Nepal ranks 59th of 200 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Manure applied — Cropland nitrogen. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).