China, mainland vs Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs): Manure applied — Cropland nitrogen

China, mainland
5.19 million t
in 2023
Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs)
2.25 million t
in 2023
China, mainland rank
3rd
Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) rank
10th

Manure applied — Cropland nitrogen over time

  • China, mainland
  • Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs)
1.0M2.0M3.0M4.0M5.0M196119922023

How they compare

China, mainland currently reports 5.19 million t against 2.25 million t in Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs), a difference of 2.94 million t.

That makes China, mainland's figure about 2.3 times Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs)'s.

Across all 63 years both countries report, China, mainland has been ahead every year.

China, mainland ranks 3rd and Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) ranks 10th of 185 countries.

China, mainland has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade China, mainland Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) Difference Ahead
1960s 1.66 million t 712,236 t 944,745 t China, mainland
1970s 2.26 million t 862,561 t 1.39 million t China, mainland
1980s 2.77 million t 975,475 t 1.79 million t China, mainland
1990s 3.97 million t 1.08 million t 2.89 million t China, mainland
2000s 4.70 million t 1.36 million t 3.34 million t China, mainland
2010s 4.77 million t 1.88 million t 2.89 million t China, mainland
2020s 5.07 million t 2.22 million t 2.85 million t China, mainland

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher manure applied — cropland nitrogen, China, mainland or Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs)?
China, mainland, at 5.19 million t against 2.25 million t in Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) as of 2023.
What is the difference in manure applied — cropland nitrogen between China, mainland and Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs)?
2.94 million t, with China, mainland ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for China, mainland and Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs)?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do China, mainland and Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) rank globally for manure applied — cropland nitrogen?
China, mainland ranks 3rd and Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) ranks 10th of 185 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Manure applied — Cropland nitrogen. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

China, mainland vs Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs): Manure applied — Cropland nitrogen. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 04 September 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/manure-applied-cropland-nitrogen/china-mainland/low-income-food-deficit-countries-lifdcs/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/manure-applied-cropland-nitrogen/china-mainland/low-income-food-deficit-countries-lifdcs/">China, mainland vs Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs): Manure applied — Cropland nitrogen</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Manure applied — Cropland nitrogen
Unit
t
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
232 places, 13,437 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).