Colombia vs Melanesia: Manure applied — Cropland nitrogen
Manure applied — Cropland nitrogen over time
- Colombia
- Melanesia
How they compare
Colombia currently reports 330,944 t against 21,402 t in Melanesia, a difference of 309,542 t.
That makes Colombia's figure about 15.5 times Melanesia's.
Across all 63 years both countries report, Colombia has been ahead every year.
Colombia ranks 15th and Melanesia ranks 14th of 185 countries.
Colombia has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Colombia | Melanesia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 107,385 t | 6,640 t | 100,745 t | Colombia |
| 1970s | 120,566 t | 8,826 t | 111,740 t | Colombia |
| 1980s | 155,040 t | 11,411 t | 143,629 t | Colombia |
| 1990s | 235,170 t | 15,178 t | 219,992 t | Colombia |
| 2000s | 282,055 t | 19,075 t | 262,980 t | Colombia |
| 2010s | 289,605 t | 20,511 t | 269,094 t | Colombia |
| 2020s | 309,218 t | 20,793 t | 288,425 t | Colombia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher manure applied — cropland nitrogen, Colombia or Melanesia?
- Colombia, at 330,944 t against 21,402 t in Melanesia as of 2023.
- What is the difference in manure applied — cropland nitrogen between Colombia and Melanesia?
- 309,542 t, with Colombia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Colombia and Melanesia?
- 63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
- How do Colombia and Melanesia rank globally for manure applied — cropland nitrogen?
- Colombia ranks 15th and Melanesia ranks 14th of 185 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Manure applied — Cropland nitrogen. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).