Congo vs Luxembourg: Manure applied — Cropland nitrogen

Congo
2,039 t
in 2023
Luxembourg
2,752 t
in 2023
Congo rank
160th
Luxembourg rank
158th

Manure applied — Cropland nitrogen over time

  • Congo
  • Luxembourg
01.0k2.0k3.0k196119922023

How they compare

Luxembourg currently reports 2,752 t against 2,039 t in Congo, a difference of 713 t.

That makes Luxembourg's figure about 1.3 times Congo's.

Across all 24 years both countries report, Luxembourg has been ahead every year.

Congo ranks 160th and Luxembourg ranks 158th of 200 countries.

Luxembourg has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Congo Luxembourg Difference Ahead
2000s 1,366 t 2,824 t 1,458 t Luxembourg
2010s 1,915 t 2,920 t 1,005 t Luxembourg
2020s 2,020 t 2,844 t 823.92 t Luxembourg

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher manure applied — cropland nitrogen, Congo or Luxembourg?
Luxembourg, at 2,752 t against 2,039 t in Congo as of 2023.
What is the difference in manure applied — cropland nitrogen between Congo and Luxembourg?
713 t, with Luxembourg ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Congo and Luxembourg?
24 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2023.
How do Congo and Luxembourg rank globally for manure applied — cropland nitrogen?
Congo ranks 160th and Luxembourg ranks 158th of 200 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Manure applied — Cropland nitrogen. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Manure applied — Cropland nitrogen
Unit
t
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
232 places, 13,437 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).