Croatia vs Finland: Manure applied — Cropland nitrogen
Manure applied — Cropland nitrogen over time
- Croatia
- Finland
How they compare
Finland currently reports 30,662 t against 25,806 t in Croatia, a difference of 4,856 t.
That makes Finland's figure about 1.2 times Croatia's.
The two have swapped places 5 times across 32 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Croatia ahead.
Croatia ranks 93rd and Finland ranks 90th of 185 countries.
Finland has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Croatia | Finland | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 38,878 t | 40,509 t | 1,631 t | Finland |
| 2000s | 35,356 t | 35,607 t | 251.05 t | Finland |
| 2010s | 31,208 t | 32,904 t | 1,697 t | Finland |
| 2020s | 27,976 t | 30,595 t | 2,618 t | Finland |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher manure applied — cropland nitrogen, Croatia or Finland?
- Finland, at 30,662 t against 25,806 t in Croatia as of 2023.
- What is the difference in manure applied — cropland nitrogen between Croatia and Finland?
- 4,856 t, with Finland ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Croatia and Finland?
- 32 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2023.
- How do Croatia and Finland rank globally for manure applied — cropland nitrogen?
- Croatia ranks 93rd and Finland ranks 90th of 185 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Manure applied — Cropland nitrogen. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).