Cuba vs Norway: Manure applied — Cropland nitrogen
Manure applied — Cropland nitrogen over time
- Cuba
- Norway
How they compare
Norway currently reports 46,697 t against 44,023 t in Cuba, a difference of 2,674 t.
That makes Norway's figure about 1.1 times Cuba's.
The two have swapped places 14 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Norway ahead.
Cuba ranks 83rd and Norway ranks 81st of 200 countries.
Across the 7 decades both report, Cuba averaged higher in 4 and Norway in 3.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Cuba | Norway | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 46,229 t | 53,575 t | 7,346 t | Norway |
| 1970s | 47,707 t | 46,905 t | 802.41 t | Cuba |
| 1980s | 52,815 t | 48,072 t | 4,743 t | Cuba |
| 1990s | 51,958 t | 48,198 t | 3,760 t | Cuba |
| 2000s | 46,654 t | 48,117 t | 1,463 t | Norway |
| 2010s | 48,152 t | 47,648 t | 503.61 t | Cuba |
| 2020s | 38,683 t | 47,382 t | 8,700 t | Norway |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher manure applied — cropland nitrogen, Cuba or Norway?
- Norway, at 46,697 t against 44,023 t in Cuba as of 2023.
- What is the difference in manure applied — cropland nitrogen between Cuba and Norway?
- 2,674 t, with Norway ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Cuba and Norway?
- 63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
- How do Cuba and Norway rank globally for manure applied — cropland nitrogen?
- Cuba ranks 83rd and Norway ranks 81st of 200 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Manure applied — Cropland nitrogen. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).