Czechia vs Portugal: Manure applied — Cropland nitrogen
Manure applied — Cropland nitrogen over time
- Czechia
- Portugal
How they compare
Portugal currently reports 67,984 t against 66,062 t in Czechia, a difference of 1,922 t.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 31 shared years of data; in 1993 it was Czechia ahead.
Czechia ranks 67th and Portugal ranks 66th of 200 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Czechia averaged higher in 2 and Portugal in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Czechia | Portugal | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 114,830 t | 89,385 t | 25,445 t | Czechia |
| 2000s | 86,493 t | 85,476 t | 1,017 t | Czechia |
| 2010s | 69,489 t | 82,149 t | 12,660 t | Portugal |
| 2020s | 64,805 t | 76,859 t | 12,054 t | Portugal |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher manure applied — cropland nitrogen, Czechia or Portugal?
- Portugal, at 67,984 t against 66,062 t in Czechia as of 2023.
- What is the difference in manure applied — cropland nitrogen between Czechia and Portugal?
- 1,922 t, with Portugal ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Czechia and Portugal?
- 31 years are reported by both, from 1993 to 2023.
- How do Czechia and Portugal rank globally for manure applied — cropland nitrogen?
- Czechia ranks 67th and Portugal ranks 66th of 200 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Manure applied — Cropland nitrogen. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).