Czechia vs South Sudan: Manure applied — Cropland nitrogen

Czechia
66,062 t
in 2023
South Sudan
59,476 t
in 2023
Czechia rank
67th
South Sudan rank
70th

Manure applied — Cropland nitrogen over time

  • Czechia
  • South Sudan
050.0k100.0k150.0k199320082023

How they compare

Czechia currently reports 66,062 t against 59,476 t in South Sudan, a difference of 6,586 t.

That makes Czechia's figure about 1.1 times South Sudan's.

Across all 12 years both countries report, Czechia has been ahead every year.

Czechia ranks 67th and South Sudan ranks 70th of 200 countries.

Czechia has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Czechia South Sudan Difference Ahead
2010s 69,223 t 52,409 t 16,814 t Czechia
2020s 64,805 t 58,372 t 6,433 t Czechia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher manure applied — cropland nitrogen, Czechia or South Sudan?
Czechia, at 66,062 t against 59,476 t in South Sudan as of 2023.
What is the difference in manure applied — cropland nitrogen between Czechia and South Sudan?
6,586 t, with Czechia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Czechia and South Sudan?
12 years are reported by both, from 2012 to 2023.
How do Czechia and South Sudan rank globally for manure applied — cropland nitrogen?
Czechia ranks 67th and South Sudan ranks 70th of 200 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Manure applied — Cropland nitrogen. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Manure applied — Cropland nitrogen
Unit
t
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
232 places, 13,437 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).