Czechoslovakia vs Eastern Africa: Manure applied β Cropland nitrogen
Manure applied β Cropland nitrogen over time
- Czechoslovakia
- Eastern Africa
How they compare
Eastern Africa currently reports 771,310 t against 229,509 t in Czechoslovakia, a difference of 541,801 t.
That makes Eastern Africa's figure about 3.4 times Czechoslovakia's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 32 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Czechoslovakia ahead.
Czechoslovakia ranks 23rd and Eastern Africa ranks 21st of 200 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Czechoslovakia averaged higher in 3 and Eastern Africa in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Czechoslovakia | Eastern Africa | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 217,885 t | 155,007 t | 62,878 t | Czechoslovakia |
| 1970s | 231,970 t | 189,859 t | 42,111 t | Czechoslovakia |
| 1980s | 259,187 t | 244,070 t | 15,117 t | Czechoslovakia |
| 1990s | 248,647 t | 291,288 t | 42,641 t | Eastern Africa |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher manure applied β cropland nitrogen, Czechoslovakia or Eastern Africa?
- Eastern Africa, at 771,310 t against 229,509 t in Czechoslovakia as of 2023.
- What is the difference in manure applied β cropland nitrogen between Czechoslovakia and Eastern Africa?
- 541,801 t, with Eastern Africa ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Czechoslovakia and Eastern Africa?
- 32 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 1992.
- How do Czechoslovakia and Eastern Africa rank globally for manure applied β cropland nitrogen?
- Czechoslovakia ranks 23rd and Eastern Africa ranks 21st of 200 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Manure applied β Cropland nitrogen. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).