Czechoslovakia vs Yugoslav SFR: Manure applied — Cropland nitrogen
Manure applied — Cropland nitrogen over time
- Czechoslovakia
- Yugoslav SFR
How they compare
Yugoslav SFR currently reports 298,451 t against 229,509 t in Czechoslovakia, a difference of 68,942 t.
That makes Yugoslav SFR's figure about 1.3 times Czechoslovakia's.
Across all 31 years both countries report, Yugoslav SFR has been ahead every year.
Czechoslovakia ranks 23rd and Yugoslav SFR ranks 20th of 200 countries.
Yugoslav SFR has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Czechoslovakia | Yugoslav SFR | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 217,885 t | 287,495 t | 69,610 t | Yugoslav SFR |
| 1970s | 231,970 t | 318,221 t | 86,251 t | Yugoslav SFR |
| 1980s | 259,187 t | 330,627 t | 71,440 t | Yugoslav SFR |
| 1990s | 258,216 t | 301,518 t | 43,302 t | Yugoslav SFR |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher manure applied — cropland nitrogen, Czechoslovakia or Yugoslav SFR?
- Yugoslav SFR, at 298,451 t against 229,509 t in Czechoslovakia as of 1991.
- What is the difference in manure applied — cropland nitrogen between Czechoslovakia and Yugoslav SFR?
- 68,942 t, with Yugoslav SFR ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Czechoslovakia and Yugoslav SFR?
- 31 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 1991.
- How do Czechoslovakia and Yugoslav SFR rank globally for manure applied — cropland nitrogen?
- Czechoslovakia ranks 23rd and Yugoslav SFR ranks 20th of 200 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Manure applied — Cropland nitrogen. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).