Dominican Republic vs Ecuador: Manure applied β Cropland nitrogen
Manure applied β Cropland nitrogen over time
- Dominican Republic
- Ecuador
How they compare
Dominican Republic currently reports 84,666 t against 82,806 t in Ecuador, a difference of 1,860 t.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Ecuador ahead.
Dominican Republic ranks 55th and Ecuador ranks 56th of 200 countries.
Ecuador has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Dominican Republic | Ecuador | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 18,754 t | 39,625 t | 20,870 t | Ecuador |
| 1970s | 20,986 t | 59,406 t | 38,420 t | Ecuador |
| 1980s | 18,793 t | 69,378 t | 50,585 t | Ecuador |
| 1990s | 28,448 t | 80,382 t | 51,934 t | Ecuador |
| 2000s | 50,430 t | 84,523 t | 34,092 t | Ecuador |
| 2010s | 64,090 t | 89,879 t | 25,789 t | Ecuador |
| 2020s | 80,717 t | 83,466 t | 2,749 t | Ecuador |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher manure applied β cropland nitrogen, Dominican Republic or Ecuador?
- Dominican Republic, at 84,666 t against 82,806 t in Ecuador as of 2023.
- What is the difference in manure applied β cropland nitrogen between Dominican Republic and Ecuador?
- 1,860 t, with Dominican Republic ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Dominican Republic and Ecuador?
- 63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
- How do Dominican Republic and Ecuador rank globally for manure applied β cropland nitrogen?
- Dominican Republic ranks 55th and Ecuador ranks 56th of 200 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Manure applied β Cropland nitrogen. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).