Ecuador vs Guatemala: Manure applied — Cropland nitrogen
Manure applied — Cropland nitrogen over time
- Ecuador
- Guatemala
How they compare
Ecuador currently reports 82,806 t against 79,036 t in Guatemala, a difference of 3,770 t.
Across all 63 years both countries report, Ecuador has been ahead every year.
Ecuador ranks 56th and Guatemala ranks 57th of 200 countries.
Ecuador has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Ecuador | Guatemala | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 39,625 t | 19,301 t | 20,324 t | Ecuador |
| 1970s | 59,406 t | 24,443 t | 34,962 t | Ecuador |
| 1980s | 69,378 t | 25,213 t | 44,165 t | Ecuador |
| 1990s | 80,382 t | 36,659 t | 43,724 t | Ecuador |
| 2000s | 84,523 t | 61,998 t | 22,525 t | Ecuador |
| 2010s | 89,879 t | 73,117 t | 16,763 t | Ecuador |
| 2020s | 83,466 t | 78,557 t | 4,909 t | Ecuador |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher manure applied — cropland nitrogen, Ecuador or Guatemala?
- Ecuador, at 82,806 t against 79,036 t in Guatemala as of 2023.
- What is the difference in manure applied — cropland nitrogen between Ecuador and Guatemala?
- 3,770 t, with Ecuador ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Ecuador and Guatemala?
- 63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
- How do Ecuador and Guatemala rank globally for manure applied — cropland nitrogen?
- Ecuador ranks 56th and Guatemala ranks 57th of 200 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Manure applied — Cropland nitrogen. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).