Ecuador vs Sudan: Manure applied — Cropland nitrogen

Ecuador
82,806 t
in 2023
Sudan
85,715 t
in 2023
Ecuador rank
56th
Sudan rank
54th

Manure applied — Cropland nitrogen over time

  • Ecuador
  • Sudan
40.0k60.0k80.0k100.0k196119922023

How they compare

Sudan currently reports 85,715 t against 82,806 t in Ecuador, a difference of 2,909 t.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 12 shared years of data; in 2012 it was Ecuador ahead.

Ecuador ranks 56th and Sudan ranks 54th of 200 countries.

Across the 2 decades both report, Ecuador averaged higher in 1 and Sudan in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Ecuador Sudan Difference Ahead
2010s 87,875 t 85,391 t 2,484 t Ecuador
2020s 83,466 t 86,209 t 2,743 t Sudan

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher manure applied — cropland nitrogen, Ecuador or Sudan?
Sudan, at 85,715 t against 82,806 t in Ecuador as of 2023.
What is the difference in manure applied — cropland nitrogen between Ecuador and Sudan?
2,909 t, with Sudan ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Ecuador and Sudan?
12 years are reported by both, from 2012 to 2023.
How do Ecuador and Sudan rank globally for manure applied — cropland nitrogen?
Ecuador ranks 56th and Sudan ranks 54th of 200 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Manure applied — Cropland nitrogen. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Manure applied — Cropland nitrogen
Unit
t
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
232 places, 13,437 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).