Eritrea vs Georgia: Manure applied — Cropland nitrogen
Manure applied — Cropland nitrogen over time
- Eritrea
- Georgia
How they compare
Eritrea currently reports 6,183 t against 5,674 t in Georgia, a difference of 509 t.
That makes Eritrea's figure about 1.1 times Georgia's.
The two have swapped places 9 times across 31 shared years of data; in 1993 it was Georgia ahead.
Eritrea ranks 142nd and Georgia ranks 143rd of 200 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Eritrea averaged higher in 1 and Georgia in 3.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Eritrea | Georgia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 3,217 t | 9,239 t | 6,022 t | Georgia |
| 2000s | 5,036 t | 9,169 t | 4,134 t | Georgia |
| 2010s | 5,927 t | 5,964 t | 36.57 t | Georgia |
| 2020s | 6,177 t | 5,902 t | 275.11 t | Eritrea |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher manure applied — cropland nitrogen, Eritrea or Georgia?
- Eritrea, at 6,183 t against 5,674 t in Georgia as of 2023.
- What is the difference in manure applied — cropland nitrogen between Eritrea and Georgia?
- 509 t, with Eritrea ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Eritrea and Georgia?
- 31 years are reported by both, from 1993 to 2023.
- How do Eritrea and Georgia rank globally for manure applied — cropland nitrogen?
- Eritrea ranks 142nd and Georgia ranks 143rd of 200 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Manure applied — Cropland nitrogen. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).