Estonia vs Israel: Manure applied — Cropland nitrogen
Manure applied — Cropland nitrogen over time
- Estonia
- Israel
How they compare
Estonia currently reports 10,707 t against 9,389 t in Israel, a difference of 1,318 t.
That makes Estonia's figure about 1.1 times Israel's.
Across all 32 years both countries report, Estonia has been ahead every year.
Estonia ranks 129th and Israel ranks 132nd of 200 countries.
Estonia has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Estonia | Israel | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 20,422 t | 7,069 t | 13,353 t | Estonia |
| 2000s | 12,257 t | 8,612 t | 3,645 t | Estonia |
| 2010s | 11,573 t | 9,568 t | 2,005 t | Estonia |
| 2020s | 10,998 t | 9,644 t | 1,355 t | Estonia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher manure applied — cropland nitrogen, Estonia or Israel?
- Estonia, at 10,707 t against 9,389 t in Israel as of 2023.
- What is the difference in manure applied — cropland nitrogen between Estonia and Israel?
- 1,318 t, with Estonia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Estonia and Israel?
- 32 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2023.
- How do Estonia and Israel rank globally for manure applied — cropland nitrogen?
- Estonia ranks 129th and Israel ranks 132nd of 200 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Manure applied — Cropland nitrogen. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).