Ethiopia vs Japan: Manure applied — Cropland nitrogen
Manure applied — Cropland nitrogen over time
- Ethiopia
- Japan
How they compare
Japan currently reports 132,494 t against 125,687 t in Ethiopia, a difference of 6,807 t.
That makes Japan's figure about 1.1 times Ethiopia's.
Across all 31 years both countries report, Japan has been ahead every year.
Ethiopia ranks 46th and Japan ranks 44th of 200 countries.
Japan has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Ethiopia | Japan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 50,342 t | 151,320 t | 100,978 t | Japan |
| 2000s | 65,948 t | 139,219 t | 73,271 t | Japan |
| 2010s | 111,815 t | 130,440 t | 18,626 t | Japan |
| 2020s | 119,386 t | 134,133 t | 14,747 t | Japan |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher manure applied — cropland nitrogen, Ethiopia or Japan?
- Japan, at 132,494 t against 125,687 t in Ethiopia as of 2023.
- What is the difference in manure applied — cropland nitrogen between Ethiopia and Japan?
- 6,807 t, with Japan ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Ethiopia and Japan?
- 31 years are reported by both, from 1993 to 2023.
- How do Ethiopia and Japan rank globally for manure applied — cropland nitrogen?
- Ethiopia ranks 46th and Japan ranks 44th of 200 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Manure applied — Cropland nitrogen. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).