Ethiopia vs Uganda: Manure applied — Cropland nitrogen
Manure applied — Cropland nitrogen over time
- Ethiopia
- Uganda
How they compare
Ethiopia currently reports 125,687 t against 105,391 t in Uganda, a difference of 20,296 t.
That makes Ethiopia's figure about 1.2 times Uganda's.
Across all 31 years both countries report, Ethiopia has been ahead every year.
Ethiopia ranks 46th and Uganda ranks 49th of 200 countries.
Ethiopia has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Ethiopia | Uganda | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 50,342 t | 32,950 t | 17,392 t | Ethiopia |
| 2000s | 65,948 t | 48,993 t | 16,955 t | Ethiopia |
| 2010s | 111,815 t | 79,690 t | 32,124 t | Ethiopia |
| 2020s | 119,386 t | 103,390 t | 15,996 t | Ethiopia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher manure applied — cropland nitrogen, Ethiopia or Uganda?
- Ethiopia, at 125,687 t against 105,391 t in Uganda as of 2023.
- What is the difference in manure applied — cropland nitrogen between Ethiopia and Uganda?
- 20,296 t, with Ethiopia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Ethiopia and Uganda?
- 31 years are reported by both, from 1993 to 2023.
- How do Ethiopia and Uganda rank globally for manure applied — cropland nitrogen?
- Ethiopia ranks 46th and Uganda ranks 49th of 200 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Manure applied — Cropland nitrogen. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).