Europe vs USSR: Manure applied — Cropland nitrogen
Manure applied — Cropland nitrogen over time
- Europe
- USSR
How they compare
Europe currently reports 5.73 million t against 5.71 million t in USSR, a difference of 27,220 t.
Across all 31 years both countries report, Europe has been ahead every year.
Europe ranks 3rd and USSR ranks 1st of 32 groups.
Europe has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Europe | USSR | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 9.19 million t | 4.45 million t | 4.74 million t | Europe |
| 1970s | 10.44 million t | 5.24 million t | 5.20 million t | Europe |
| 1980s | 11.28 million t | 5.86 million t | 5.42 million t | Europe |
| 1990s | 10.91 million t | 5.77 million t | 5.14 million t | Europe |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher manure applied — cropland nitrogen, Europe or USSR?
- Europe, at 5.73 million t against 5.71 million t in USSR as of 2023.
- What is the difference in manure applied — cropland nitrogen between Europe and USSR?
- 27,220 t, with Europe ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Europe and USSR?
- 31 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 1991.
- How do Europe and USSR rank globally for manure applied — cropland nitrogen?
- Europe ranks 3rd and USSR ranks 1st of 32 groups.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Manure applied — Cropland nitrogen. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).