Finland vs Zambia: Manure applied — Cropland nitrogen
Manure applied — Cropland nitrogen over time
- Finland
- Zambia
How they compare
Finland currently reports 30,662 t against 26,257 t in Zambia, a difference of 4,405 t.
That makes Finland's figure about 1.2 times Zambia's.
Across all 63 years both countries report, Finland has been ahead every year.
Finland ranks 97th and Zambia ranks 100th of 200 countries.
Finland has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Finland | Zambia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 66,451 t | 3,127 t | 63,323 t | Finland |
| 1970s | 59,166 t | 5,551 t | 53,614 t | Finland |
| 1980s | 52,167 t | 6,885 t | 45,283 t | Finland |
| 1990s | 41,239 t | 9,133 t | 32,106 t | Finland |
| 2000s | 35,607 t | 11,735 t | 23,871 t | Finland |
| 2010s | 32,904 t | 23,191 t | 9,713 t | Finland |
| 2020s | 30,595 t | 25,579 t | 5,015 t | Finland |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher manure applied — cropland nitrogen, Finland or Zambia?
- Finland, at 30,662 t against 26,257 t in Zambia as of 2023.
- What is the difference in manure applied — cropland nitrogen between Finland and Zambia?
- 4,405 t, with Finland ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Finland and Zambia?
- 63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
- How do Finland and Zambia rank globally for manure applied — cropland nitrogen?
- Finland ranks 97th and Zambia ranks 100th of 200 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Manure applied — Cropland nitrogen. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).