Georgia vs Liberia: Manure applied — Cropland nitrogen
Manure applied — Cropland nitrogen over time
- Georgia
- Liberia
How they compare
Georgia currently reports 5,674 t against 4,978 t in Liberia, a difference of 696 t.
That makes Georgia's figure about 1.1 times Liberia's.
Across all 32 years both countries report, Georgia has been ahead every year.
Georgia ranks 132nd and Liberia ranks 134th of 185 countries.
Georgia has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Georgia | Liberia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 9,867 t | 2,159 t | 7,707 t | Georgia |
| 2000s | 9,169 t | 2,766 t | 6,403 t | Georgia |
| 2010s | 5,964 t | 4,876 t | 1,088 t | Georgia |
| 2020s | 5,902 t | 4,958 t | 944.21 t | Georgia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher manure applied — cropland nitrogen, Georgia or Liberia?
- Georgia, at 5,674 t against 4,978 t in Liberia as of 2023.
- What is the difference in manure applied — cropland nitrogen between Georgia and Liberia?
- 696 t, with Georgia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Georgia and Liberia?
- 32 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2023.
- How do Georgia and Liberia rank globally for manure applied — cropland nitrogen?
- Georgia ranks 132nd and Liberia ranks 134th of 185 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Manure applied — Cropland nitrogen. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).