Georgia vs Libya: Manure applied — Cropland nitrogen
Manure applied — Cropland nitrogen over time
- Georgia
- Libya
How they compare
Libya currently reports 6,297 t against 5,674 t in Georgia, a difference of 623 t.
That makes Libya's figure about 1.1 times Georgia's.
The two have swapped places 5 times across 32 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Georgia ahead.
Georgia ranks 143rd and Libya ranks 141st of 200 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Georgia averaged higher in 3 and Libya in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Georgia | Libya | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 9,867 t | 3,905 t | 5,962 t | Georgia |
| 2000s | 9,169 t | 4,624 t | 4,546 t | Georgia |
| 2010s | 5,964 t | 5,952 t | 12.46 t | Georgia |
| 2020s | 5,902 t | 6,164 t | 262.15 t | Libya |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher manure applied — cropland nitrogen, Georgia or Libya?
- Libya, at 6,297 t against 5,674 t in Georgia as of 2023.
- What is the difference in manure applied — cropland nitrogen between Georgia and Libya?
- 623 t, with Libya ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Georgia and Libya?
- 32 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2023.
- How do Georgia and Libya rank globally for manure applied — cropland nitrogen?
- Georgia ranks 143rd and Libya ranks 141st of 200 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Manure applied — Cropland nitrogen. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).