Guinea vs Latvia: Manure applied — Cropland nitrogen
Manure applied — Cropland nitrogen over time
- Guinea
- Latvia
How they compare
Guinea currently reports 17,659 t against 16,611 t in Latvia, a difference of 1,048 t.
That makes Guinea's figure about 1.1 times Latvia's.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 32 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Latvia ahead.
Guinea ranks 119th and Latvia ranks 122nd of 200 countries.
Latvia has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Guinea | Latvia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 4,561 t | 32,219 t | 27,658 t | Latvia |
| 2000s | 7,353 t | 18,741 t | 11,388 t | Latvia |
| 2010s | 12,376 t | 17,765 t | 5,389 t | Latvia |
| 2020s | 17,079 t | 17,417 t | 337.33 t | Latvia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher manure applied — cropland nitrogen, Guinea or Latvia?
- Guinea, at 17,659 t against 16,611 t in Latvia as of 2023.
- What is the difference in manure applied — cropland nitrogen between Guinea and Latvia?
- 1,048 t, with Guinea ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Guinea and Latvia?
- 32 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2023.
- How do Guinea and Latvia rank globally for manure applied — cropland nitrogen?
- Guinea ranks 119th and Latvia ranks 122nd of 200 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Manure applied — Cropland nitrogen. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).